Constrained types for object-oriented languages
Nathaniel Nystrom, Vijay Saraswat, et al.
OOPSLA 2008
In 1992 when we completed our first draft of the History of Programming Languages II paper, The Evolution of Lisp [1], it included sections on a theory or model of how complex language families like Lisp grew and evolved, and in particular, how and when diversity would bloom and consolidation would prune. The historian who worked with all the HOPL II authors, Michael S. Mahoney, did not believe our theory was substantiated properly, so he recommended removing the material and sticking with the narrative of Lisp's evolution. We stopped working on those sections, but they remained in the original text sources but removed with conditionals. Copyright © 2008 ACM.
Nathaniel Nystrom, Vijay Saraswat, et al.
OOPSLA 2008
David W. Jacobs, Daphna Weinshall, et al.
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Minerva M. Yeung, Fred Mintzer
ICIP 1997
Graham Mann, Indulis Bernsteins
DIMEA 2007