(1 + ε)-approximate sparse recovery
Eric Price, David P. Woodruff
FOCS 2011
This article studies how a mechanism designer can influence games by promising payments to the players depending on their mutual choice of strategies. First, we investigate the cost of implementing a desirable behavior and present algorithms to compute this cost. Whereas a mechanism designer can decide efficiently whether strategy profiles can be implemented at no cost at all our complexity analysis indicates that computing an optimal implementation is generally NP-hard. Second, we introduce and analyze the concept of leverage in a game. The leverage captures the benefits that a benevolent or a malicious mechanism designer can achieve by implementing a certain strategy profile region within economic reason, i.e., by taking the implementation cost into account. Mechanism designers can often manipulate games and change the social welfare by a larger extent than the amount of money invested. Unfortunately, computing the leverage turns out to be intractable as well in the general case. © 2011 World Scientific Publishing Company.
Eric Price, David P. Woodruff
FOCS 2011
Raymond F. Boyce, Donald D. Chamberlin, et al.
CACM
Marshall W. Bern, Howard J. Karloff, et al.
Theoretical Computer Science
Michael Ray, Yves C. Martin
Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering